Murder on the Orient Express
Murder on the Orient Express
Kenneth Branagh, Director
We feel ya, lady seated in the next row back. We like Kenneth Branagh, and Johnny Depp, and Judi Dench, and Willem Dafoe, and Michelle Pfeiffer, and Penelope Cruz (well, sorta), and Josh Gad and Derek Jacobi…but this movie is stupid.
OK. Maybe we’re out of line to say such a thing about this lush production full of all these beautiful people. There were at least a couple of noteworthy elements to this 70mm spectacle: 1. Branagh’s mesmerizing mustache and 2. that super cool avalanche.
But we went to MOE anyway. The previews were just so pretty.
Also, we grant that it’s not reasonable to downgrade a movie that we slept through, even if we snoozed only a very few minutes, 10 at the most.
But let’s be clear:
Hercule Poirot is not normal. Yes, yes, we know, that’s the premise. He’s extraordinary. By his own declaration, he’s “probably the greatest detective in the world.” But come on – nobody is that deductively gifted. Nobody.
And once, when he was rejecting the gangster Edward Ratchett’s (Johnny Depp) request for Poirot’s services as a body guard, did he seem to be acting on normal, believable human instincts.
Hercule Poirot doesn’t play nice. He has all the good clues and won’t share them. His mode of operating is to spring them on us when it’s most likely to make us, embodied in his shadow tagalong, feel dumb – less competent, less insightful – than HE is. We want to play along with the detective thing and feel at least dull-normal in our ability to track. But Poirot keeps all the real clues for himself, never giving the viewer a fair shot.
Speaking of which: Too many red herrings! O.M.G! Every passenger has a perfectly good motive and opportunity. The ins and outs of the convoluted threads of the intertwined lives of the complex relationships and the improbable likelihood of their all having E-tickets on the same train on the same day, across this scary computer-generated landscape – well, it’s more than an earnest crime solver can endure.
The resolution is beyond implausible. Don’t worry, we won’t spoil it for you here, but rest assured, if you’re a normal, investigation-loving, CSI-bingeing, Forensic Files geek, you will be so pissed off by the time you get to the Last Supper tableau in the finale, you’ll want to turn on your cell phone right there in the theatre and, and, and...what? Call your mother? Tell her what she already knows: All this exposition of the unexplainable (in reasonable, believable terms) makes a movie-goer want to spin around and explode.
Perfectly good actors left us unmoved because even though MOE is a period piece, NOBODY ever thought those thoughts or plotted those plots or did those things. In this script their characters are useful only in delivering misdirection. So Golden Globe winner & Oscar nominee Michelle Pfeiffer, as Mrs. Hubbard, is only to be avoided. Golden Globe & Oscar nominee Willem Dafoe, as Gerhard Hardman, barely rates a dismissive shrug. And Golden Globe & Oscar winner Judi Dench – Dame Judi! – whose glances can wither, seems bloodless and full of moth balls.
Only Daisy Ridley, as Miss Mary Debenham, truly engages and challenges Poirot, and grips the audience with a true air of mystery.
So, yeah. We probably weren’t the intended audience and this is a biased review. This story, this movie, is of a time gone by. If you can still enjoy Sherlock Holmes talking down to sweet old Watson, you’ll be fine. If you don’t mind being treated as a lame second fiddle rather than a full on partner in solving the crime, well, this is the show for you. Have fun watching Poirot in action.
For today's mystery fans and crime solvers, not so much.
6 out of 10 Whiskers ********* |
Six Degrees
1. Daisy Ridley in Star Wars: The Force Awakens with
Oscar Isaac
2. Oscar Isaac in Ex Machina with Alicia Vikander
3. Alicia Vikander in Burnt with Bradley Cooper
4. Bradley Cooper in Limitless with Robert de Niro
5. Robert de Niro in Sleepers with Kevin Bacon
Iaou
Comments
Post a Comment